AMD Quietly Unveils Radeon M400 Series: Starting With Rebadges

Home

>

GPUs

AMD Quietly Unveils Radeon M400 Series: Starting With Rebadges

by

Ryan Smith

on May 14, 2016 8:40 AM EST

Posted in

GPUs

AMD

Radeon

GCN

Laptops

Notebooks

49

Comments

|

Add A Comment

49

Comments

+ Add AComment

As our long-time readers are keenly aware, the product cycles followed by PC OEMs and ODMs for their laptops and desktops are rarely perfectly in sync with the development cycles of the underlying processors. With a desire to refresh their PCs on a yearly basis – whether or not new processors are available – OEMs lean on their suppliers to come up with newer parts to fill out these devices. Consequently, it has become

a semi-annual ritual

for the GPU vendors to rebadge parts of their lineups to meet the needs of OEMs, shuffling together old and new parts as part of a continuous cycle of upgrades and replacements.

Kicking off this latest cycle, this week AMD quietly updated the

laptop GPU section of their website

to add the Radeon M400 series, the latest generation of AMD’s notebook (and AIO desktop) GPUs. And to cut right to the chase, while this year is going to be an important year for AMD with the launch of their Polaris architecture and its accompanying GPUs, Polaris isn’t upon us quite yet. Instead what AMD has published are the customary 28nm rebadges that will be fleshing out the M400 line, presumably positioned around where Polaris will land a bit later this year.

As these product updates aren’t coming alongside any other formal product announcement, there’s little information on AMD’s branding/positioning direction at this time. So the information we have is limited to some basic hardware specifications. Given the timing of this release – just two weeks before Computex – I expect we’ll see more from AMD as part of their annual Computex presentations. In the meantime if you see Radeon M400 parts start to show up in laptop specification sheets ahead of Computex, here is what’s going on under the hood.

AMD R9 M400 Series GPU Specifications

R9 M485X

R9 M470X

R9 M470

Was

Variant of R9 M395X

Variant of R9 M385X

Variant of R9 M380

Stream Processors

2048

896

768

Texture Units

128

56

48

ROPs

32

16

16

Memory Clock

<= 5Gbps GDDR5

<= 6Gbps GDDR5

<= 6Gbps GDDR5

Memory Bus Width

256-bit

128-bit

128-bit

VRAM

<= 8GB

<=4GB

<=4GB

GPU

Tonga

Bonaire

Bonaire

Manufacturing Process

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

Architecture

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.1

GCN 1.1

The sizable high-performance Radeon R9 M300 family has been trimmed significantly for the R9 M400 family, which at least until the launch of Polaris is composed of three products: M485X, M470X, and M470. The former is identical in specification to R9 M395X, making it a rebadged GCN 1.2 Tonga part with all 2048 SPs enabled. Meanwhile the M470 series follows the M380 series, making it rebadges of the GCN 1.1 Bonaire GPU. M470X would be a fully enabled part with all 896 SPs enabled, while M470 cuts that down to 768 SPs.

Meanwhile, not found here are any parts based on AMD’s venerable GCN 1.0 Pitcairn GPU. After a run of over 4 years, it looks like Pitcairn has set off on a well-deserved retirement.

AMD R7 M400 Series GPU Specifications

R7 M465X

R7 M465

R7 M460

R7 M445

R7 M440

Was

Variant of R9 M370

Variant of R7 M370

Variant of R7 M360

Variant of R7 M340

Variant of R7 M340

Stream Processors

512

384

384

320

320

Texture Units

32

24

24

20

20

ROPs

16

8

8?

4?

4?

Memory Clock

<= 4.5Gbps GDDR5

<= 4.6Gbps GDDR5

<= 2Gbps DDR3

<= 4Gbps GDDR5

<= 2Gbps DDR3

Memory Bus Width

128-bit

64/128-bit

64-bit

64-bit

64-bit

VRAM

<= 4GB

<=4GB

<=4GB

<=4GB

<=4GB

GPU

Cape Verde

Topaz

Topaz

Topaz

Topaz

Manufacturing Process

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

Architecture

GCN 1.0

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.2

As for the R7 level of GPUs, AMD is introducing 5 different models. The part that immediately sticks out the most is the 512 SP R7 M465X, which has no immediate predecessor in AMD’s catalog. Based on the limited information here, this looks to be a cut-down version of

R9 M370 series

, which utilized the GCN 1.0 Cape Verde GPU. This part doesn’t feature all of Cape Verde’s SPs enabled, but does retain the higher bandwidth offered by GDDR5.

Below the M465X things get murkier with the remaining M460 series and M440 series parts. AMD has a number of overlapping parts here, and the underlying configurations are not well documented to the public. The M465 could be multiple parts, but most likely we’re looking at Topaz in two different configurations, with one featuring the full 128-bit memory bus, while another features a neutered 64-bit memory bus. In any case these seem to be rebadges/retools of the R7 M370, meaning we’re looking at 384 SPs with differing amounts of memory bandwidth. The M460 on the other hand looks to be a straight-up rebadge of the M360, another Topaz-esque part with a 64-bit memory bus and DDR3 memory.

Rounding out the R7 collection is the M440 and M445, each of which features 320 SPs. These again are likely Topaz parts, with the published difference being the memory technology. M445 uses GDDR5 on a 64-bit memory bus, while M440 uses DDR3 on the same sized bus. These are essentially rebadges/retools of the R7 M340.

AMD R5 M400 Series GPU Specifications

R5 M435

R5 M430

R5 M420

Was

New

Variant of R5 M330

Variant of R5 M320

Stream Processors

320

320

320

Texture Units

20

20

20

ROPs

4?

4?

4?

Memory Clock

<= 4Gbps GDDR5

<= 2Gbps DDR3

<= 2Gbps DDR3

Memory Bus Width

64-bit

64-bit

64-bit

VRAM

<= 4GB

<=4GB

<=4GB

GPU

Topaz?

Topaz?

Topaz?

Manufacturing Process

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

TSMC 28nm

Architecture

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.2

GCN 1.2

Finally bringing up the rear are the R5 M400 series. These 320 SP parts are likely candidates to be paired with APUs for dual graphics operation. At the top of the list is the R5 M435, and highly unusual for an R5 part features GDDR5 memory on a 64-bit memory bus. AMD has never offered a 320 SP part with GDDR5 before, so while it’s vaguely similar to the R7 340, it has no real predecessor. Meanwhile the R5 M430 and M420 are almost certainly direct rebadges of the M330 and M320 respectively.

The bigger question of course is where products based on AMD’s forthcoming Polaris GPUs will fit into these lineups. Having undertaken their annual rebadge, at this point it’s safe to assume that the Polaris parts will be sold under the M400 banner as well. And given the performance AMD has been touting, I’m sure we’ll be looking at a fuller R9 M400 lineup once that happens. In the meantime we’ll have to see what AMD has planned for the Radeon Mobility family at Computex.

Source:

AMD (via SH SOTN)

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Post Your Comment

Please

log in

or

sign up

to comment.

POST A COMMENT

49 Comments

View All Comments

Alphasite

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Out of interest, why do you guys still ever to them as GCN 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, etc? Would it not be more congruent to use AMD's official naming scheme?

Reply

AS118

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

That's actually a good point, I know people may be used to that, but going forward, it would cause less confusion, especially when AMD releases its own info.

Reply

ImSpartacus

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Maybe they are trying to be consistent with historical terminology? I mean, they used the term "4th gen" GCN in the Polaris reveal article earlier this year, so Ryan is obviously aware of it.

Reply

Ryan Smith

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Spartacus is correct. At this point I'm being consistent with existing names; Polaris will be GCN4, reflecting AMD's revised naming.

Reply

farmergann

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

I'd suggest they also change the m465x to Gen3 GCN as it appears to be a mobile dGPU equivalent of Carrizo's GPU.

Reply

extide

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Uhhh, no. They have it labeled correctly. It is not at all a GCN 3 (1.2) part.

Reply

rtho782

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Because this naming makes sense, and AMD are "consistently inconsistent" with their naming, and will (as the article shows) rename the same products for the sake of a higher number.With this naming, I know which support freesync, trueaudio, etc.

Reply

AS118

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Well, while I was hoping Polaris would fill up most of the M400 series lineup, I guess this isn't totally unexpected. Similar to when Maxwell was first launching for Nvidia, I guess.

Reply

ImSpartacus

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Yeah, I'm surprised that there are so many rebrands on the mobile side. I figured at least the top end stuff would use Polaris. I mean, Polaris 10 could surely be reined in to 100W MXM-B gaming stuff and Polaris 11 could definitely fit into 50W MXM-A as well as most mid-range discrete stuff.

Reply

extide

- Saturday, May 14, 2016 -

link

Polaris 10 will be in the R9 M490/x (or possibly 495) series, and Polaris 11 will be the M480/x. You can see they slot in nicely right there.

Reply

1

2

3

4

5

PIPELINE STORIES

+ Submit News

AT Deals: Seasonic PRIME GX-750 PSU Now $91 at Newegg

Best AMD Motherboards: August 2021

Best Intel Motherboards: August 2021

MinisForum Unveils Cezanne EliteMini HX90 and Tiger Lake EliteMini TL50 mini-PCs

AT Deals: ViewSonic 27-Inch AdobeRGB WQHD Monitor Now $399

ASRock Rack Announces Two ATX Ice Lake SP Motherboards

Google Teases Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro with new "Tensor" SoC

ASUS Unveils ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme Motherboard: Flagship X570

ASRock Unveils C621A WS Motherboard, Designed for Xeon W-3300 Workstations

AMD Announces Radeon RX 6600 XT: Mainstream RDNA2 Lands August 11th For $379

JEDEC Publishes LPDDR5X Standard at up to 8533 Mbps

AT Deals: Samsung 980 1TB SSD At New Low Price of $109

TWEETS

andreif7

:

@nottheengineer My XM3s also have the hiss. Also got a pair of Drop Pandas and they also have it.

IanCutress

:

@dweekly Video version too... :) https://t.co/TTXfugi8bQ

IanCutress

:

'Tech Breakthrough has been in development for years'Obvious headline is obvious. This is not 'news'. They don't... https://t.co/pBvST5VBKw

IanCutress

:

Upcoming article preview... :) https://t.co/3qCKcSwmkR

IanCutress

:

@YeNoname It was intentional :) And yeah, the goal of these interviews along with new product knowledge is to get a... https://t.co/P5DKO8bhTK

andreif7

:

@CDemerjian @amarvir02 @W00tMa5ter you mean 24?

IanCutress

:

For a Monday morning interview, @rebeccalipon is easily the most enthusiastic and energetic interviewee we've ever... https://t.co/938eOymfu3

RyanSmithAT

:

@DanMatte Speaking of display matters, did Sony ever explain what was going on with the console's HDMI bandwidth?

RyanSmithAT

:

RT @DanMatte: It’s starting to get alarmingly late in the game for Sony not to have VRR working yet on the PS5.

andreif7

:

@handleym99 It's got nothing to do with BT itself. It's because the anaemic DAC/amps are incredibly bad and have... https://t.co/6Hg6RqIeKh

andreif7

:

@centurio9 I'm shocked at the amount of people not hearing it.

andreif7

:

@elfary74 @shure That was a physical recording from an actual pair so dBFS isn't a valid metric, I don't have a pro... https://t.co/CO6hTiDbnR

RyanSmithAT

:

@IanCutress @Supercomputing Seeing as how I typically lose steak bets, I'm going to bet against myself on this one.... https://t.co/j4S5vw4Rgm

RyanSmithAT

:

@IanCutress The last time I did a system rebuild, I made a virtual machine of my previous system first. That helped... https://t.co/j7OqZFCWQ1

RyanSmithAT

:

It's taken a bit longer than usual, but AMD's Zen 3 (Cezanne) APUs are finally coming to the retail market.... https://t.co/4y5nJ9eyWB

ganeshts

:

@ricswi Looks like that requirement is Home-only. Other editions will still allow local accounts. I can't remember... https://t.co/qOvPnduAuY

ganeshts

:

@Laughing_Man @hnpn914 Benson, is there an update planned for the Twinkie PD to support EPR? I still use the USBC-T... https://t.co/D6g5nmQvB5

ganeshts

:

@bdmurdock Not aware of a standard way, but I have seen simulator wrapper scripts with a `timeout' prefix. Also o... https://t.co/aIgUTOeXcx

ganeshts

:

@mikeev @BrettHowse @IanCutress For games, a combination of Powershell + (WinAppDriver / AutoHotKey) works, but it... https://t.co/Fhh8j0VZLa

ganeshts

:

@mikeev @BrettHowse @IanCutress I use Perl & Python on RHEL for my primary work, and Powershell for all AnandTech-r... https://t.co/7uCllPz9T3

Follow

@

ANANDTECH

Popular Articles